Best Companies in the Regulatory Affairs Industry

AbbVie

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Staff members highlight AbbVie’s strong compensation, comprehensive benefits, and a purpose-driven environment that supports growth. Employees note a culture of innovation balanced with some structural complexity, where job security is tied to a stable pipeline. Opportunities for advancement are valued, though bureaucracy can affect work-life balance. Leadership is described as supportive yet demanding, while the company’s community engagement reflects its social responsibility. Overall, employees feel rewarded by meaningful work paired with competitive pay and career potential.

Abbott Laboratories

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees describe Abbott as a mission-driven company with steady job security, competitive benefits, and a culture that values integrity. Leadership is seen as approachable, and career development is often encouraged through internal promotions. While some mention a traditional management style that impacts work-life balance, many appreciate the stable environment and compensation. Staff members also highlight the company’s consistent focus on innovation in healthcare, along with its strong commitment to social responsibility and ethical practices.

Accenture 

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Accenture professionals report strong exposure to regulatory consulting projects, career development, and diverse client challenges. Compensation and benefits are considered competitive, and innovation is emphasized in regulatory technology solutions. At the same time, work-life balance is often difficult due to demanding schedules, and job security may fluctuate with project assignments. Staff describe leadership as both ambitious and supportive, while the company’s social responsibility initiatives and adaptability reinforce its role as a destination for regulatory consulting talent.

Amgen

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees cite Amgen’s patient-focused culture, steady job security, and commitment to innovation as reasons for satisfaction. Compensation and benefits are viewed as generous, with career growth supported through structured development programs. Staff also appreciate leadership’s emphasis on collaboration and inclusion, though some report the workload can challenge balance. Opportunities to contribute to impactful science are consistently mentioned, along with pride in the company’s social responsibility efforts and stability within the pharmaceutical sector.

Bayer U.S. 

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Team members at Bayer U.S. mention a strong mission, competitive benefits, and a culture that values learning. Regulatory professionals note a mix of stability and complexity, especially after acquisitions and restructuring. Compensation is seen as fair, while leadership earns respect for innovation but faces critiques for hierarchy. Opportunities for growth exist, though advancement can be slow. Staff highlight the company’s social impact work and its commitment to scientific responsibility, even as some express concerns about long-term job security.

Biogen

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees describe Biogen as offering meaningful work in neuroscience and regulatory innovation, with comprehensive benefits and compensation that support retention. While leadership’s transparency receives mixed reviews, staff appreciate inclusive initiatives and opportunities for advancement. Job security is sometimes questioned due to reorganizations, yet the mission-driven environment fosters pride. Work-life balance varies by team, but employees emphasize that the scientific impact and adaptability of the company outweigh challenges. Social responsibility is also noted as part of the culture.

BioMarin Pharmaceutical 

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees highlight BioMarin’s focus on rare diseases, which inspires collaboration and purpose. Compensation and benefits are frequently praised, and staff report that leadership supports transparency and innovation. Career development opportunities are present but may lack formal structure, and workloads can be demanding. Still, employees feel the environment offers balance, pride in meaningful work, and strong job security tied to its robust pipeline. The company’s commitment to patients and social impact further adds to positive employee sentiment.

Bristol Myers Squibb

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Staff highlight Bristol Myers Squibb’s inclusive culture, strong leadership, and consistent investment in innovation. Employees value competitive benefits, career development opportunities, and the balance between biotech agility and pharmaceutical stability. Some note restructuring has created uncertainty, though most report that the pipeline ensures security. Compensation is described as fair, and the culture emphasizes collaboration. The company’s adaptability, commitment to patients, and social responsibility efforts contribute to a sense of pride among regulatory professionals.

Certara 

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees point to Certara’s innovative biosimulation work, supportive leadership, and flexible environment as reasons for satisfaction. Work-life balance is often praised, aided by remote options and a collaborative culture. Compensation is competitive, though staff emphasize that career development and meaningful contributions drive loyalty. Employees describe the company as adaptive and innovative, providing a stable platform for job security. Social responsibility initiatives and recognition for leadership transparency are also highlighted as part of the positive employee experience.

Charles River Laboratories 

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Staff members mention Charles River as a strong entry point into regulatory and clinical work, with a steady flow of opportunities for skill-building. Compensation and benefits are viewed as adequate, though not industry-leading, and work-life balance depends on role and project load. Job security is generally steady, with employees citing stability as a draw. The culture encourages learning, and leadership provides a degree of guidance, though some employees seek more innovation and clearer career progression pathways.

Eli Lilly and Company

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees note Lilly’s history of innovation, competitive compensation, and strong benefits as key drivers of satisfaction. The culture emphasizes ethical leadership and career growth opportunities, with staff highlighting a sense of pride in the company’s commitment to science. Job security is seen as stable, and social responsibility efforts add to its reputation. Work-life balance varies by department but is generally considered manageable. Overall, staff appreciate the balance of stability, opportunity, and responsibility within the organization.

Genentech 

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees at Genentech report pride in the company’s patient-first mission, innovative culture, and inclusive environment. Compensation and benefits are consistently praised, while leadership is described as collaborative and forward-looking. Career development opportunities are abundant, supported by strong internal training. Staff note that work can be demanding, but the sense of purpose and job security provided by its robust pipeline outweighs challenges. Employees also emphasize the company’s visible commitment to social responsibility and scientific excellence.

Gilead Sciences

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Staff highlight Gilead’s impact in virology, along with competitive pay and comprehensive benefits. Employees describe a mix of collaborative and high-pressure environments, depending on the team. Career advancement opportunities are present, though leadership transitions have brought some uncertainty. Job security remains strong due to the company’s global presence and pipeline. Innovation and adaptability are frequently noted, and employees value its commitment to patient impact and social responsibility, even while acknowledging the challenges of balancing workload demands.

IQVIA 

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees describe IQVIA as a place offering diverse regulatory projects, global exposure, and room for career growth. Compensation and benefits are reported as competitive, though experiences vary significantly by team. Staff members cite leadership quality as mixed but note that adaptability and innovation remain central. Work-life balance can be difficult in some roles, but the company’s scale and industry relevance provide job security. Employees also point to social responsibility initiatives that support engagement and pride.

Johnson & Johnson

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees report that Johnson & Johnson’s ethical culture, strong leadership, and comprehensive benefits create an environment of pride. Compensation is competitive, and opportunities for growth are widespread due to the company’s size and diversity. Staff note that work-life balance is generally manageable, supported by policies that emphasize employee well-being. Job security is tied to its broad pipeline and stable market presence. Employees also appreciate the company’s visible social responsibility and commitment to innovation across healthcare.

Labcorp

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees highlight Labcorp as a place to gain regulatory and clinical experience, noting consistent opportunities for professional development. Compensation is considered below peers, and benefits can feel costly, yet staff recognize the breadth of experience offered. Work-life balance is described as challenging due to workload, but job security is tied to its established role in clinical research. Employees also report pride in the company’s adaptability and its role in advancing healthcare despite internal challenges.

Medtronic 

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees value Medtronic’s mission-driven culture, steady job security, and competitive compensation. Benefits are praised, and staff highlight strong opportunities for internal mobility and professional growth. Leadership is viewed as supportive, though the large structure can slow decision-making. Work-life balance depends on team, with some citing high tempo. Employees also emphasize the company’s adaptability, social responsibility initiatives, and culture of innovation in medical devices as reasons for continued satisfaction.

Merck & Co.

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Staff describe Merck as offering competitive pay, robust benefits, and steady job security, with employees citing pride in its culture of innovation. Leadership is viewed as supportive and inclusive, with opportunities for career development available across multiple departments. Employees highlight the company’s strong ethical standards and commitment to social responsibility. Work-life balance is generally positive, though workloads can vary. Adaptability and scientific excellence are frequently mentioned as contributors to employee satisfaction in regulatory roles.

Pfizer

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees note Pfizer’s large pipeline, competitive benefits, and visible innovation as reasons for satisfaction. Compensation is considered fair, and opportunities for growth are numerous due to its size. Staff describe the culture as varied, with some teams providing strong support and others struggling with workload and leadership changes. Job security is seen as solid, though reorganizations create occasional uncertainty. Employees also point to the company’s adaptability, commitment to inclusion, and visible contributions to social responsibility.

ProPharma

Why This Company Has Been Nominated:
Employees at ProPharma cite opportunities to deepen expertise in regulatory sciences, strong collaboration, and leadership that emphasizes professional growth. Staff describe the culture as supportive and adaptive, with work that remains diverse across product lifecycles. Compensation and benefits are competitive, and job security is tied to consistent demand for specialized consulting. Employees also highlight opportunities for innovation, adaptability in meeting client needs, and a sense of social responsibility within the organization.